Looking back on this weeks work and having discussed it with fellow classmates and tutors during my crit I came to realise alot of things upon my own reflections and from the critisms of others.Firstly,I am glad that I took the risk and re-explored the word rebels as it taught me to be less attached to my work and more open to different avenues appearing.I feel that re-approaching the word ‘rebels’ for the 2nd time the approach was more obvious using cowboys/bandits and influences of ‘Punk’ era but one criticism I did face was ‘were Cowboys actually rebels?’And that maybe I should of focused more on southern rebels and outlaws. Another suggestion was that maybe i should of focused on rebellion in today’s era because in an age of comformity what is rebellion? And that maybe I should of focused on the politicians of today who are rebelling against the political system.Does this make them the rebels of todays society?I feel that i should of spent more time developing and reckonising elements of the cowboys piece that needed changed as it was pointed out to me that the cowboys worked well without being placed into a ‘scene’ with the poster behind them.I experimented with this and noticed the difference immediately.Visually I think the first part of my project worked better but only because more development was put into it.I also found it more aesthetically pleasing due to this.Therefore I would say that this was the more sucessful part of the project altho i hold no regrets over ‘risk taking’ and reigning the project back in to it’s original title.But it would still be interesting to see where the ‘creature like’aspect of the parcels would of gone had I not.